They will sell because people already have a GBA library. But I see your point about $30 more for the DS. The size of an iPod mini though, thats pretty nice.
They will sell because people already have a GBA library
And then they obviously already have a GBA in some form. I was willing to pay $50 for this thing, and that was the rumored price for a while. You know just as well as I do this is way too high for a console that offers nothing new other than size. The orignal GBA launched at this price (at least I think it was, I imported). I'm sure the technology is a hell of a lot cheaper.
My question is: Why not spend the extra $30 for a DS?
The DS is pretty big. I don't take the DS along if I don't have a bag with me where I can put it in. I Micro is better suited for that. I'll wait until it's cheaper, though.
I'm not so sure Nintendo is trying to screw people with the price. Making stuff smaller simply costs more, and such a small screen needs a pretty good resolution, too.
They will sell because people already have a GBA library.
The DS can play these games, too, to it's not really an argument for the Micro.
Fits in my pocket fine, though it is bulky. Like I said, if the Micro was $50, I'd be all over it. I think you're thinking the same way.
I'm not so sure Nintendo is trying to screw people with the price. Making stuff smaller simply costs more, and such a small screen needs a pretty good resolution, too.
Oh, I'm sure it costs more to make than a SP. However, the game technology isn't exactly new. Some of those new plug-n-play games equal it in a few ways.
Like I said, if the Micro was $50, I'd be all over it. I think you're thinking the same way.
Yeah, I agree. If I didn't already own an SP, I would possibly buy the Micro in addition to my DS. But it doesn't offer enough over the SP, and for people who own neither, the DS is clearly the best choice. I can see how people who mostly want to play their console while on the go and who don't usually take bags along for the ride would prefer the Micro to the DS despite the similar cost, though.
Some of those new plug-n-play games equal it in a few ways.
Probably a room issue. I think the GBA and the SP contain all the hardware of the GBC in order to play these games. The Micro is pretty small, after all. It's still a pity, though.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author and do not reflect those of any corporation, business entity, group or club the author has ever been associated with. Feel free to quote anything I say but do me the courtesy of a link back (see Creative Commons license).
Comments (9)
Wrong link Matt.
Posted by Ken Edwards | August 17, 2005 1:00 PM
Posted on August 17, 2005 13:00
Everything happens for a reason I guess. The article now has the price officially too.
My question is:
Why not spend the extra $30 for a DS? If you want to play orignal Game Boy/Color games, buy a Color for $10 off eBay.
The Micro will sell of course, they always do. This time out though, I don't get it.
Posted by Matt Paprocki | August 17, 2005 1:50 PM
Posted on August 17, 2005 13:50
They will sell because people already have a GBA library. But I see your point about $30 more for the DS. The size of an iPod mini though, thats pretty nice.
Posted by Ken Edwards | August 17, 2005 1:54 PM
Posted on August 17, 2005 13:54
They will sell because people already have a GBA library
And then they obviously already have a GBA in some form. I was willing to pay $50 for this thing, and that was the rumored price for a while. You know just as well as I do this is way too high for a console that offers nothing new other than size. The orignal GBA launched at this price (at least I think it was, I imported). I'm sure the technology is a hell of a lot cheaper.
Posted by Matt Paprocki | August 17, 2005 2:05 PM
Posted on August 17, 2005 14:05
The DS is pretty big. I don't take the DS along if I don't have a bag with me where I can put it in. I Micro is better suited for that. I'll wait until it's cheaper, though.
I'm not so sure Nintendo is trying to screw people with the price. Making stuff smaller simply costs more, and such a small screen needs a pretty good resolution, too.
The DS can play these games, too, to it's not really an argument for the Micro.
Posted by LKM | August 17, 2005 2:53 PM
Posted on August 17, 2005 14:53
The DS is pretty big.
Fits in my pocket fine, though it is bulky. Like I said, if the Micro was $50, I'd be all over it. I think you're thinking the same way.
I'm not so sure Nintendo is trying to screw people with the price. Making stuff smaller simply costs more, and such a small screen needs a pretty good resolution, too.
Oh, I'm sure it costs more to make than a SP. However, the game technology isn't exactly new. Some of those new plug-n-play games equal it in a few ways.
Posted by Matt Paprocki | August 17, 2005 3:11 PM
Posted on August 17, 2005 15:11
Yeah, I agree. If I didn't already own an SP, I would possibly buy the Micro in addition to my DS. But it doesn't offer enough over the SP, and for people who own neither, the DS is clearly the best choice. I can see how people who mostly want to play their console while on the go and who don't usually take bags along for the ride would prefer the Micro to the DS despite the similar cost, though.
What plug-n-play games?
Posted by LKM | August 17, 2005 4:49 PM
Posted on August 17, 2005 16:49
What plug-n-play games?
They're cheap joysticks with games stored on them. They retail for about $20. They mostly contain licensed crap or classic games.
Want to find out how even more absurd this is? It won't play standard Game Boy Games or Color.
http://gameboy.ign.com/articles/642/642275p1.html
Way out of hand now.
Posted by Matt Paprocki | August 17, 2005 5:02 PM
Posted on August 17, 2005 17:02
Probably a room issue. I think the GBA and the SP contain all the hardware of the GBC in order to play these games. The Micro is pretty small, after all. It's still a pity, though.
Posted by LKM | August 18, 2005 10:45 AM
Posted on August 18, 2005 10:45