I wouldn't say it's clearly CG, but you can tell if you look. I caught it when I looked at the arm. I thought it was the bottom one at first given the blurry road (bad texture and motion blur), but the arm was unaturally crooked.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the author and do not reflect those of any corporation, business entity, group or club the author has ever been associated with. Feel free to quote anything I say but do me the courtesy of a link back (see Creative Commons license).
Comments (4)
I am thinking it is the top image that is the 360. The body of the bike with the text looks bad.
Posted by Ken Edwards | December 29, 2005 4:16 PM
Posted on December 29, 2005 16:16
Same. The road texture also looks wrong.
Posted by Neil T. | December 30, 2005 8:20 AM
Posted on December 30, 2005 08:20
top one is clearly computer generated. Looks pretty good though. Wonder how it looks in motion, and how detailed the tracks and background are.
Posted by LKM | January 1, 2006 12:46 PM
Posted on January 1, 2006 12:46
I wouldn't say it's clearly CG, but you can tell if you look. I caught it when I looked at the arm. I thought it was the bottom one at first given the blurry road (bad texture and motion blur), but the arm was unaturally crooked.
Posted by Matt Paprocki | January 1, 2006 8:50 PM
Posted on January 1, 2006 20:50